MIS 587
Blog 1
Due: 2/03/2015
Rui He
Business Intelligence &
Analysis Products
Scan & Evaluation
The figure below is called “Magic Quadrant”, a scatter plot developed
by Gartner to show how the major players in the current Business Intelligence
and Analysis market perform.
Figure 1. Magic Quadrant for Business Intelligence and Analytics
Platforms
In this figure, Gartner analysts set two rules, which are ability to execute
and completeness of vision, as their judge criteria. From the figure, we can easily capture a rough
idea about how those major players perform according to the two criteria.
Today, I will choose five BI analysis products (not top 5 products) from
the figure to compare their overall performance from 5 criteria.
The five products I will examine today will be
Tableau,
QilkView,
MicroStrategy,
Information Builders,
and Jaspersoft.
The five criteria used for judgment will be
Functionality,
Ease to use,
Performance,
Productivity,
and Cost.
Below is the table that displays my evaluation of the five chosen products
according to my criteria.
|
Weight
|
Tableau
|
QilkView
|
MicroStrategy
|
Information Builders
|
Jaspersoft
|
Functionality
|
25%
|
8
|
9
|
9
|
9
|
8
|
Ease to Use
|
15%
|
8
|
10
|
8
|
8
|
8
|
Performance
|
30%
|
9
|
8
|
7
|
8
|
8
|
Productivity
|
20%
|
8
|
8
|
7
|
9
|
7
|
Cost
|
10%
|
7
|
8
|
7
|
9
|
9
|
Points
|
100%
|
8.20
|
8.30
|
7.40
|
8.30
|
7.90
|
Rank
|
|
3
|
1
|
5
|
1
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What does each criterion mean here?
1. Functionality
Functionality
means capability and extensibility. Capability refers to the range of BI
functions that the BI product can support. The more functions that the product
has, the higher score it will get for this criterion. Extensibility mainly
stands for integration ability in this scenario. For example, the easier that
the product can be integrated into web portal, the higher score that the
product will achieve. Or the more applications like R, Java, and etc. that the
product can be embedded into, the higher score that the product will achieve.
2. Ease to Use
It includes
three aspects. Difficulty level of installation of the product, intuitive level
of the GUI/user interface design of the product, and the convenience level of
the future and upgrade/maintenance. The easier to install, the more intuitive
to explore and use the product, and the easier to maintain and upgrade the BI
product, the higher score that the product will get for this criterion.
3. Performance
It includes
aspects. First, the level of business functions that it can support. This is a
different requirement than the functionality. Functionality puts more focus on
the BI analysis technology perspective like ETL and OLAP, which are standard features.
On the other hand, performance concentrates on some plus features or special
points, such as ad-hoc slice and dice and some other embedded insights between
its product families. Second, stability is also one of the important features
in performance. The more stable that the product is, the higher score it will
obtain.
4. Productivity
This criterion
focuses on the soft technologies that enable users can effectively improve
their productivity. Business dashboards and data visualizations are very good
examples that reveal the meaning of productivity.
5. Cost
Cost is
also a very critical factor to evaluate when consider which BI tool to choose,
regardless the size of organizations or companies.
Detailed Evaluations and Explanations
Tableau
Tableau is
often the first supplier that comes to mind when businesses consider data
visualization tools. While the product is easy to use, and produces very
attractive visuals, it is not particularly sophisticated and may prove
inadequate as needs mature. It is still a classic choice between ease-of-use
and sophistication. However, Tableau must lose its market share when more
competitors entering into the market in the future.
QilkView
The QlikView BI platform has
the ability to be all things to all people, and will satisfy business users,
developers and enterprise needs. It sets the right balance between ease-of-use
and sophistication. Great extensibility and the ability to create new chart
types and BI apps make QlikView win the game.
MicroStrategy
MicroStrategy is in many
ways a meeting of the old and new in business intelligence, and takes the
positives from both. It is truly an enterprise solution meeting the less
glamorous demands for regular reporting, complex dashboards and extensive
admin, while offering up the sexier self-service BI users now expect from a BI
solution. It is expensive, and for organizations with less demanding
requirements other options will be more economical.
Information Builders
Information Builders is a
long established supplier of BI, analytics and integration technologies.
The integration of BI and data mining is quite unique and puts IB ahead
of the crowd. The maturity, sophistication and value for money, is very hard to
beat.
Jaspersoft
Jaspersoft does not
particularly distinguish itself in any way, but neither does it have any
striking inadequacies. This BI suite will address the BI needs of many
organizations without a great deal of fuss, and can be extended to meet bespoke
requirements.
Conclusion
Overall, I will recommend either Qilkview or Information Builders for your BI Analysis Tools.